>>>>>>DROUGHT>>>DROUGHT IS>>>DROUGHT IS BACK>>>DROUGHT IS BACK AND>>>DROUGHT IS BACK AND I>>>DROUGHT IS BACK AND I
STAYED. STAYED. STAYED.
LET’S STAYED.
LET’S LOOK STAYED.
LET’S LOOK AT STAYED.
LET’S LOOK AT THE STAYED.
LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES STAYED.
LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES OF STAYED.
LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES OF A LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES OF A LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES OF A
BIG-TIME LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES OF A
BIG-TIME SNOW LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES OF A
BIG-TIME SNOW SEASON LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES OF A
BIG-TIME SNOW SEASON THAT LET’S LOOK AT THE CHANCES OF A
BIG-TIME SNOW SEASON THAT MIGHT BIG-TIME SNOW SEASON THAT MIGHT BIG-TIME SNOW SEASON THAT MIGHT
FIXED BIG-TIME SNOW SEASON THAT MIGHT
FIXED IT. FIXED IT. FIXED IT.
NEXT. NEXT. NEXT.
>>>NEXT.
>>>SUPERVISED NEXT.
>>>SUPERVISED DRUG NEXT.
>>>SUPERVISED DRUG INJECTION>>>SUPERVISED DRUG INJECTION>>>SUPERVISED DRUG INJECTION
SITES>>>SUPERVISED DRUG INJECTION
SITES IN>>>SUPERVISED DRUG INJECTION
SITES IN DENVER,>>>SUPERVISED DRUG INJECTION
SITES IN DENVER, IT>>>SUPERVISED DRUG INJECTION
SITES IN DENVER, IT ONLY>>>SUPERVISED DRUG INJECTION
SITES IN DENVER, IT ONLY SEEMS SITES IN DENVER, IT ONLY SEEMS SITES IN DENVER, IT ONLY SEEMS
LIKE SITES IN DENVER, IT ONLY SEEMS
LIKE THE SITES IN DENVER, IT ONLY SEEMS
LIKE THE IDEA SITES IN DENVER, IT ONLY SEEMS
LIKE THE IDEA IS SITES IN DENVER, IT ONLY SEEMS
LIKE THE IDEA IS DONE. LIKE THE IDEA IS DONE. LIKE THE IDEA IS DONE.
BECAUSE LIKE THE IDEA IS DONE.
BECAUSE BEHIND LIKE THE IDEA IS DONE.
BECAUSE BEHIND THE LIKE THE IDEA IS DONE.
BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, LIKE THE IDEA IS DONE.
BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, IN BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, IN BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, IN
OTHER BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, IN
OTHER STATES BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, IN
OTHER STATES THE BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, IN
OTHER STATES THE IDEA BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, IN
OTHER STATES THE IDEA OF BECAUSE BEHIND THE SCENES, IN
OTHER STATES THE IDEA OF GIVING OTHER STATES THE IDEA OF GIVING OTHER STATES THE IDEA OF GIVING
DRUG OTHER STATES THE IDEA OF GIVING
DRUG USERS OTHER STATES THE IDEA OF GIVING
DRUG USERS A OTHER STATES THE IDEA OF GIVING
DRUG USERS A CONTROLLED DRUG USERS A CONTROLLED DRUG USERS A CONTROLLED
ENVIRONMENT DRUG USERS A CONTROLLED
ENVIRONMENT FOR DRUG USERS A CONTROLLED
ENVIRONMENT FOR GETTING DRUG USERS A CONTROLLED
ENVIRONMENT FOR GETTING HIGH DRUG USERS A CONTROLLED
ENVIRONMENT FOR GETTING HIGH IS ENVIRONMENT FOR GETTING HIGH IS ENVIRONMENT FOR GETTING HIGH IS
BEING ENVIRONMENT FOR GETTING HIGH IS
BEING DISCUSSED. BEING DISCUSSED. BEING DISCUSSED.
DEMOCRATS BEING DISCUSSED.
DEMOCRATS IN BEING DISCUSSED.
DEMOCRATS IN THE BEING DISCUSSED.
DEMOCRATS IN THE COLORADO DEMOCRATS IN THE COLORADO DEMOCRATS IN THE COLORADO
LEGISLATURE DEMOCRATS IN THE COLORADO
LEGISLATURE DID DEMOCRATS IN THE COLORADO
LEGISLATURE DID NOT DEMOCRATS IN THE COLORADO
LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE DEMOCRATS IN THE COLORADO
LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE THE LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE THE LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE THE
VOTES LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE THE
VOTES TO LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE THE
VOTES TO ALLOW LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE THE
VOTES TO ALLOW DENVER LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE THE
VOTES TO ALLOW DENVER TO LEGISLATURE DID NOT HAVE THE
VOTES TO ALLOW DENVER TO DO VOTES TO ALLOW DENVER TO DO VOTES TO ALLOW DENVER TO DO
THIS VOTES TO ALLOW DENVER TO DO
THIS PAST VOTES TO ALLOW DENVER TO DO
THIS PAST YEAR. THIS PAST YEAR. THIS PAST YEAR.
>>THIS PAST YEAR.
>>Reporter: THIS PAST YEAR.
>>Reporter: IT THIS PAST YEAR.
>>Reporter: IT WENT THIS PAST YEAR.
>>Reporter: IT WENT FROM THIS PAST YEAR.
>>Reporter: IT WENT FROM LOUD>>Reporter: IT WENT FROM LOUD>>Reporter: IT WENT FROM LOUD
TO>>Reporter: IT WENT FROM LOUD
TO QUITE>>Reporter: IT WENT FROM LOUD
TO QUITE BUT>>Reporter: IT WENT FROM LOUD
TO QUITE BUT THE>>Reporter: IT WENT FROM LOUD
TO QUITE BUT THE CONVERSATION TO QUITE BUT THE CONVERSATION TO QUITE BUT THE CONVERSATION
ABOUT TO QUITE BUT THE CONVERSATION
ABOUT SUPERVISED TO QUITE BUT THE CONVERSATION
ABOUT SUPERVISED USED TO QUITE BUT THE CONVERSATION
ABOUT SUPERVISED USED SITES ABOUT SUPERVISED USED SITES ABOUT SUPERVISED USED SITES
NEVER ABOUT SUPERVISED USED SITES
NEVER STOPPED. NEVER STOPPED. NEVER STOPPED.
>>NEVER STOPPED.
>>THE NEVER STOPPED.
>>THE STIGMA, NEVER STOPPED.
>>THE STIGMA, SHAME NEVER STOPPED.
>>THE STIGMA, SHAME AND>>THE STIGMA, SHAME AND>>THE STIGMA, SHAME AND
INCORPORATION>>THE STIGMA, SHAME AND
INCORPORATION WORKED>>THE STIGMA, SHAME AND
INCORPORATION WORKED YEARS>>THE STIGMA, SHAME AND
INCORPORATION WORKED YEARS AGO. INCORPORATION WORKED YEARS AGO. INCORPORATION WORKED YEARS AGO.
IS INCORPORATION WORKED YEARS AGO.
IS DRIVING INCORPORATION WORKED YEARS AGO.
IS DRIVING US INCORPORATION WORKED YEARS AGO.
IS DRIVING US UNDERGROUND INCORPORATION WORKED YEARS AGO.
IS DRIVING US UNDERGROUND WHERE IS DRIVING US UNDERGROUND WHERE IS DRIVING US UNDERGROUND WHERE
PEOPLE IS DRIVING US UNDERGROUND WHERE
PEOPLE GOT IS DRIVING US UNDERGROUND WHERE
PEOPLE GOT PREVENTABLE IS DRIVING US UNDERGROUND WHERE
PEOPLE GOT PREVENTABLE CHRONIC PEOPLE GOT PREVENTABLE CHRONIC PEOPLE GOT PREVENTABLE CHRONIC
DISEASES. DISEASES. DISEASES.
>>DISEASES.
>>Reporter: DISEASES.
>>Reporter: IT DISEASES.
>>Reporter: IT IS DISEASES.
>>Reporter: IT IS TURNED DISEASES.
>>Reporter: IT IS TURNED UP>>Reporter: IT IS TURNED UP>>Reporter: IT IS TURNED UP
AGAIN>>Reporter: IT IS TURNED UP
AGAIN BECAUSE>>Reporter: IT IS TURNED UP
AGAIN BECAUSE OF>>Reporter: IT IS TURNED UP
AGAIN BECAUSE OF A>>Reporter: IT IS TURNED UP
AGAIN BECAUSE OF A JUDGE’S AGAIN BECAUSE OF A JUDGE’S AGAIN BECAUSE OF A JUDGE’S
RULING AGAIN BECAUSE OF A JUDGE’S
RULING OUT AGAIN BECAUSE OF A JUDGE’S
RULING OUT OF AGAIN BECAUSE OF A JUDGE’S
RULING OUT OF PHILADELPHIA RULING OUT OF PHILADELPHIA RULING OUT OF PHILADELPHIA
THAT’S RULING OUT OF PHILADELPHIA
THAT’S THE RULING OUT OF PHILADELPHIA
THAT’S THE SUPERVISED RULING OUT OF PHILADELPHIA
THAT’S THE SUPERVISED INJECTION THAT’S THE SUPERVISED INJECTION THAT’S THE SUPERVISED INJECTION
SITE THAT’S THE SUPERVISED INJECTION
SITE WOULD THAT’S THE SUPERVISED INJECTION
SITE WOULD NOT THAT’S THE SUPERVISED INJECTION
SITE WOULD NOT VIOLATE THAT’S THE SUPERVISED INJECTION
SITE WOULD NOT VIOLATE FEDERAL SITE WOULD NOT VIOLATE FEDERAL SITE WOULD NOT VIOLATE FEDERAL
DRUG SITE WOULD NOT VIOLATE FEDERAL
DRUG LAWS. DRUG LAWS. DRUG LAWS.
>>DRUG LAWS.
>>I DRUG LAWS.
>>I JUMPED DRUG LAWS.
>>I JUMPED UP DRUG LAWS.
>>I JUMPED UP AND DRUG LAWS.
>>I JUMPED UP AND DOWN DRUG LAWS.
>>I JUMPED UP AND DOWN AND>>I JUMPED UP AND DOWN AND>>I JUMPED UP AND DOWN AND
CLAPPED>>I JUMPED UP AND DOWN AND
CLAPPED MY>>I JUMPED UP AND DOWN AND
CLAPPED MY HANDS>>I JUMPED UP AND DOWN AND
CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE>>I JUMPED UP AND DOWN AND
CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE THIS CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE THIS CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE THIS
IS CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE THIS
IS GREAT CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE THIS
IS GREAT FOR CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE THIS
IS GREAT FOR THE CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE THIS
IS GREAT FOR THE UNITED CLAPPED MY HANDS BECAUSE THIS
IS GREAT FOR THE UNITED STATES. IS GREAT FOR THE UNITED STATES. IS GREAT FOR THE UNITED STATES.
>>IS GREAT FOR THE UNITED STATES.
>>Reporter: IS GREAT FOR THE UNITED STATES.
>>Reporter: THE IS GREAT FOR THE UNITED STATES.
>>Reporter: THE RULING IS GREAT FOR THE UNITED STATES.
>>Reporter: THE RULING PRICKED>>Reporter: THE RULING PRICKED>>Reporter: THE RULING PRICKED
INTEREST>>Reporter: THE RULING PRICKED
INTEREST IN>>Reporter: THE RULING PRICKED
INTEREST IN COLORADO>>Reporter: THE RULING PRICKED
INTEREST IN COLORADO INCLUDING INTEREST IN COLORADO INCLUDING INTEREST IN COLORADO INCLUDING
LISA INTEREST IN COLORADO INCLUDING
LISA RAYVILLE INTEREST IN COLORADO INCLUDING
LISA RAYVILLE WITH INTEREST IN COLORADO INCLUDING
LISA RAYVILLE WITH A INTEREST IN COLORADO INCLUDING
LISA RAYVILLE WITH A HARM LISA RAYVILLE WITH A HARM LISA RAYVILLE WITH A HARM
REDUCTION LISA RAYVILLE WITH A HARM
REDUCTION CENTER. REDUCTION CENTER. REDUCTION CENTER.
DENVER REDUCTION CENTER.
DENVER CITY REDUCTION CENTER.
DENVER CITY COUNCIL REDUCTION CENTER.
DENVER CITY COUNCIL PASSED REDUCTION CENTER.
DENVER CITY COUNCIL PASSED AN DENVER CITY COUNCIL PASSED AN DENVER CITY COUNCIL PASSED AN
ORDINANCE DENVER CITY COUNCIL PASSED AN
ORDINANCE FOR DENVER CITY COUNCIL PASSED AN
ORDINANCE FOR A DENVER CITY COUNCIL PASSED AN
ORDINANCE FOR A SIMILAR DENVER CITY COUNCIL PASSED AN
ORDINANCE FOR A SIMILAR PROGRAM ORDINANCE FOR A SIMILAR PROGRAM ORDINANCE FOR A SIMILAR PROGRAM
LAST ORDINANCE FOR A SIMILAR PROGRAM
LAST YEAR. LAST YEAR. LAST YEAR.
>>LAST YEAR.
>>PEOPLE LAST YEAR.
>>PEOPLE THOUGHT LAST YEAR.
>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE LAST YEAR.
>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT LAST YEAR.
>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT AWAY>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT AWAY>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT AWAY
BUT>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT AWAY
BUT WE>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT AWAY
BUT WE SADLY>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT AWAY
BUT WE SADLY DIDN’T>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT AWAY
BUT WE SADLY DIDN’T GO>>PEOPLE THOUGHT WE WENT AWAY
BUT WE SADLY DIDN’T GO AWAY. BUT WE SADLY DIDN’T GO AWAY. BUT WE SADLY DIDN’T GO AWAY.
>>BUT WE SADLY DIDN’T GO AWAY.
>>Reporter: BUT WE SADLY DIDN’T GO AWAY.
>>Reporter: THE BUT WE SADLY DIDN’T GO AWAY.
>>Reporter: THE U.S.>>Reporter: THE U.S.>>Reporter: THE U.S.
ATTORNEY’S>>Reporter: THE U.S.
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE>>Reporter: THE U.S.
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN>>Reporter: THE U.S.
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN COLORADO ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN COLORADO ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN COLORADO
WAS ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN COLORADO
WAS CLEAR ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN COLORADO
WAS CLEAR THAT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN COLORADO
WAS CLEAR THAT THEY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN COLORADO
WAS CLEAR THAT THEY THINK ATTORNEY’S OFFICE IN COLORADO
WAS CLEAR THAT THEY THINK THE WAS CLEAR THAT THEY THINK THE WAS CLEAR THAT THEY THINK THE
IDEA WAS CLEAR THAT THEY THINK THE
IDEA IS WAS CLEAR THAT THEY THINK THE
IDEA IS ILLEGAL. IDEA IS ILLEGAL. IDEA IS ILLEGAL.
AND IDEA IS ILLEGAL.
AND THE IDEA IS ILLEGAL.
AND THE JUDGE’S IDEA IS ILLEGAL.
AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IDEA IS ILLEGAL.
AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IS IDEA IS ILLEGAL.
AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IS NOT AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IS NOT AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IS NOT
BINDING AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IS NOT
BINDING IN AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IS NOT
BINDING IN COLORADO AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IS NOT
BINDING IN COLORADO AND AND THE JUDGE’S DECISION IS NOT
BINDING IN COLORADO AND IS BINDING IN COLORADO AND IS BINDING IN COLORADO AND IS
LIKELY BINDING IN COLORADO AND IS
LIKELY TO BINDING IN COLORADO AND IS
LIKELY TO BE BINDING IN COLORADO AND IS
LIKELY TO BE APPEALED. LIKELY TO BE APPEALED. LIKELY TO BE APPEALED.
>>LIKELY TO BE APPEALED.
>>THE LIKELY TO BE APPEALED.
>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT LIKELY TO BE APPEALED.
>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY LIKELY TO BE APPEALED.
>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME
OUT>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME
OUT LAST>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME
OUT LAST WEEK>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME
OUT LAST WEEK WHEN>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME
OUT LAST WEEK WHEN I>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME
OUT LAST WEEK WHEN I HAVE>>THE ANNOUNCEMENT THEY CAME
OUT LAST WEEK WHEN I HAVE A OUT LAST WEEK WHEN I HAVE A OUT LAST WEEK WHEN I HAVE A
DIRECT OUT LAST WEEK WHEN I HAVE A
DIRECT IMPACT OUT LAST WEEK WHEN I HAVE A
DIRECT IMPACT ON OUT LAST WEEK WHEN I HAVE A
DIRECT IMPACT ON DENVER. DIRECT IMPACT ON DENVER. DIRECT IMPACT ON DENVER.
>>DIRECT IMPACT ON DENVER.
>>Reporter: DIRECT IMPACT ON DENVER.
>>Reporter: EARLIER DIRECT IMPACT ON DENVER.
>>Reporter: EARLIER THIS DIRECT IMPACT ON DENVER.
>>Reporter: EARLIER THIS YEAR>>Reporter: EARLIER THIS YEAR>>Reporter: EARLIER THIS YEAR
STATE>>Reporter: EARLIER THIS YEAR
STATE LAWMAKERS>>Reporter: EARLIER THIS YEAR
STATE LAWMAKERS CAN>>Reporter: EARLIER THIS YEAR
STATE LAWMAKERS CAN GET>>Reporter: EARLIER THIS YEAR
STATE LAWMAKERS CAN GET ENOUGH STATE LAWMAKERS CAN GET ENOUGH STATE LAWMAKERS CAN GET ENOUGH
SUPPORT STATE LAWMAKERS CAN GET ENOUGH
SUPPORT TO STATE LAWMAKERS CAN GET ENOUGH
SUPPORT TO WAIVE STATE LAWMAKERS CAN GET ENOUGH
SUPPORT TO WAIVE A STATE LAWMAKERS CAN GET ENOUGH
SUPPORT TO WAIVE A NUISANCE SUPPORT TO WAIVE A NUISANCE SUPPORT TO WAIVE A NUISANCE
ORDINANCE SUPPORT TO WAIVE A NUISANCE
ORDINANCE TO SUPPORT TO WAIVE A NUISANCE
ORDINANCE TO OPEN SUPPORT TO WAIVE A NUISANCE
ORDINANCE TO OPEN THE SUPPORT TO WAIVE A NUISANCE
ORDINANCE TO OPEN THE PILOT ORDINANCE TO OPEN THE PILOT ORDINANCE TO OPEN THE PILOT
PROGRAM. PROGRAM. PROGRAM.
THAT PROGRAM.
THAT PROBLEM PROGRAM.
THAT PROBLEM IS PROGRAM.
THAT PROBLEM IS STILL THAT PROBLEM IS STILL THAT PROBLEM IS STILL
LINGERING. LINGERING. LINGERING.
WHILE LINGERING.
WHILE LAWMAKERS LINGERING.
WHILE LAWMAKERS ARE LINGERING.
WHILE LAWMAKERS ARE TALKING WHILE LAWMAKERS ARE TALKING WHILE LAWMAKERS ARE TALKING
ABOUT WHILE LAWMAKERS ARE TALKING
ABOUT IT, WHILE LAWMAKERS ARE TALKING
ABOUT IT, DEMOCRATIC ABOUT IT, DEMOCRATIC ABOUT IT, DEMOCRATIC
REPRESENTATIVE ABOUT IT, DEMOCRATIC
REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE ABOUT IT, DEMOCRATIC
REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE HARROD REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE HARROD REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE HARROD
SET REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE HARROD
SET A REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE HARROD
SET A NEW REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE HARROD
SET A NEW DILL REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE HARROD
SET A NEW DILL ISN’T REPRESENTATIVE LESLIE HARROD
SET A NEW DILL ISN’T ACTIVELY SET A NEW DILL ISN’T ACTIVELY SET A NEW DILL ISN’T ACTIVELY
BEING SET A NEW DILL ISN’T ACTIVELY
BEING WORKED SET A NEW DILL ISN’T ACTIVELY
BEING WORKED ON. BEING WORKED ON. BEING WORKED ON.
>>BEING WORKED ON.
>>WE BEING WORKED ON.
>>WE WILL BEING WORKED ON.
>>WE WILL INTRODUCE BEING WORKED ON.
>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BEING WORKED ON.
>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL BEING WORKED ON.
>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL I>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL I>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL I
THINK>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL I
THINK IF>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL I
THINK IF THE>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL I
THINK IF THE VOTES>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL I
THINK IF THE VOTES ARE>>WE WILL INTRODUCE A BILL I
THINK IF THE VOTES ARE THERE. THINK IF THE VOTES ARE THERE. THINK IF THE VOTES ARE THERE.
>>THINK IF THE VOTES ARE THERE.
>>Reporter: THINK IF THE VOTES ARE THERE.
>>Reporter: FELLOW THINK IF THE VOTES ARE THERE.
>>Reporter: FELLOW DEMOCRATIC>>Reporter: FELLOW DEMOCRATIC>>Reporter: FELLOW DEMOCRATIC
BRITTANY>>Reporter: FELLOW DEMOCRATIC
BRITTANY PATTERSON>>Reporter: FELLOW DEMOCRATIC
BRITTANY PATTERSON THAT BRITTANY PATTERSON THAT BRITTANY PATTERSON THAT
CHAMPION BRITTANY PATTERSON THAT
CHAMPION THE BRITTANY PATTERSON THAT
CHAMPION THE SITE BRITTANY PATTERSON THAT
CHAMPION THE SITE THIS BRITTANY PATTERSON THAT
CHAMPION THE SITE THIS YEAR CHAMPION THE SITE THIS YEAR CHAMPION THE SITE THIS YEAR
LEARNED CHAMPION THE SITE THIS YEAR
LEARNED A CHAMPION THE SITE THIS YEAR
LEARNED A LOT CHAMPION THE SITE THIS YEAR
LEARNED A LOT OVER CHAMPION THE SITE THIS YEAR
LEARNED A LOT OVER THE CHAMPION THE SITE THIS YEAR
LEARNED A LOT OVER THE POLITICS LEARNED A LOT OVER THE POLITICS LEARNED A LOT OVER THE POLITICS
AND LEARNED A LOT OVER THE POLITICS
AND THINKS LEARNED A LOT OVER THE POLITICS
AND THINKS THERE’S LEARNED A LOT OVER THE POLITICS
AND THINKS THERE’S A LEARNED A LOT OVER THE POLITICS
AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT LEARNED A LOT OVER THE POLITICS
AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT OF AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT OF AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT OF
EDUCATION AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT OF
EDUCATION THAT AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT OF
EDUCATION THAT NEEDS AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT OF
EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT OF
EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE AND THINKS THERE’S A LOT OF
EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
BEFORE EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
BEFORE AN EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
BEFORE AN IDEA EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE THIS EDUCATION THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE
BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE THIS CAN BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE THIS CAN BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE THIS CAN
MOVE BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE THIS CAN
MOVE FORWARD BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE THIS CAN
MOVE FORWARD AND BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE THIS CAN
MOVE FORWARD AND WORRIES BEFORE AN IDEA LIKE THIS CAN
MOVE FORWARD AND WORRIES THE MOVE FORWARD AND WORRIES THE MOVE FORWARD AND WORRIES THE
CONVERSATIONS MOVE FORWARD AND WORRIES THE
CONVERSATIONS ABOUT MOVE FORWARD AND WORRIES THE
CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE MOVE FORWARD AND WORRIES THE
CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU
SITE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU
SITE IS CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU
SITE IS SO CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU
SITE IS SO DIVISIVE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU
SITE IS SO DIVISIVE IT CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU
SITE IS SO DIVISIVE IT COULD CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SAFE YOU
SITE IS SO DIVISIVE IT COULD BE SITE IS SO DIVISIVE IT COULD BE SITE IS SO DIVISIVE IT COULD BE
DOING SITE IS SO DIVISIVE IT COULD BE
DOING HARM SITE IS SO DIVISIVE IT COULD BE
DOING HARM BY SITE IS SO DIVISIVE IT COULD BE
DOING HARM BY STIGMA. DOING HARM BY STIGMA. DOING HARM BY STIGMA.
INSTEAD DOING HARM BY STIGMA.
INSTEAD SENATOR DOING HARM BY STIGMA.
INSTEAD SENATOR PATTERSON DOING HARM BY STIGMA.
INSTEAD SENATOR PATTERSON IS INSTEAD SENATOR PATTERSON IS INSTEAD SENATOR PATTERSON IS
FOCUSING INSTEAD SENATOR PATTERSON IS
FOCUSING ON INSTEAD SENATOR PATTERSON IS
FOCUSING ON LEGISLATION INSTEAD SENATOR PATTERSON IS
FOCUSING ON LEGISLATION THAT FOCUSING ON LEGISLATION THAT FOCUSING ON LEGISLATION THAT
WORKS FOCUSING ON LEGISLATION THAT
WORKS ON FOCUSING ON LEGISLATION THAT
WORKS ON EVERYTHING FOCUSING ON LEGISLATION THAT
WORKS ON EVERYTHING FROM WORKS ON EVERYTHING FROM WORKS ON EVERYTHING FROM
EDUCATION WORKS ON EVERYTHING FROM
EDUCATION TO WORKS ON EVERYTHING FROM
EDUCATION TO TREATMENT. WORKS ON EVERYTHING FROM
EDUCATION TO TREATMENT. THAT EDUCATION TO TREATMENT. THAT EDUCATION TO TREATMENT. THAT
SHE EDUCATION TO TREATMENT. THAT
SHE THINKS EDUCATION TO TREATMENT. THAT
SHE THINKS WILL EDUCATION TO TREATMENT. THAT
SHE THINKS WILL ULTIMATELY EDUCATION TO TREATMENT. THAT
SHE THINKS WILL ULTIMATELY HELP SHE THINKS WILL ULTIMATELY HELP SHE THINKS WILL ULTIMATELY HELP
MORE SHE THINKS WILL ULTIMATELY HELP
MORE PEOPLE. MORE PEOPLE. MORE PEOPLE.
BUT MORE PEOPLE.
BUT SHE MORE PEOPLE.
BUT SHE SAID MORE PEOPLE.
BUT SHE SAID IT MORE PEOPLE.
BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T MORE PEOPLE.
BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T ALWAYS BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T ALWAYS BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T ALWAYS
GET BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T ALWAYS
GET A BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T ALWAYS
GET A LOT BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T ALWAYS
GET A LOT OF BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T ALWAYS
GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BUT SHE SAID IT DOESN’T ALWAYS
GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE
IT GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE
IT IS GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE
IT IS AND GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE
IT IS AND THE GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE
IT IS AND THE FLASHY GET A LOT OF ATTENTION BECAUSE
IT IS AND THE FLASHY HEADLINES IT IS AND THE FLASHY HEADLINES IT IS AND THE FLASHY HEADLINES
WHEN IT IS AND THE FLASHY HEADLINES
WHEN IT IT IS AND THE FLASHY HEADLINES
WHEN IT COMES IT IS AND THE FLASHY HEADLINES
WHEN IT COMES TO IT IS AND THE FLASHY HEADLINES
WHEN IT COMES TO THE IT IS AND THE FLASHY HEADLINES
WHEN IT COMES TO THE OPIOID WHEN IT COMES TO THE OPIOID WHEN IT COMES TO THE OPIOID
EPIDEMIC. EPIDEMIC. EPIDEMIC.
>>EPIDEMIC.
>>IS EPIDEMIC.
>>IS COMPLICATED EPIDEMIC.
>>IS COMPLICATED BUT EPIDEMIC.
>>IS COMPLICATED BUT WE EPIDEMIC.
>>IS COMPLICATED BUT WE HAVE>>IS COMPLICATED BUT WE HAVE>>IS COMPLICATED BUT WE HAVE
TOLD>>IS COMPLICATED BUT WE HAVE
TOLD PEOPLE>>IS COMPLICATED BUT WE HAVE
TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT>>IS COMPLICATED BUT WE HAVE
TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE>>IS COMPLICATED BUT WE HAVE
TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP
PROCESS TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP
PROCESS BUT TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP
PROCESS BUT DENVER TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP
PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP
PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP
PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THE TWO-STEP
PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS
WE PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS
WE WANT PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS
WE WANT AND PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS
WE WANT AND THE PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS
WE WANT AND THE STATE PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS
WE WANT AND THE STATE HAS PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS
WE WANT AND THE STATE HAS A PROCESS BUT DENVER HAS A SAY AS
WE WANT AND THE STATE HAS A SAY WE WANT AND THE STATE HAS A SAY WE WANT AND THE STATE HAS A SAY
OKAY. OKAY. OKAY.
THE OKAY.
THE STATE OKAY.
THE STATE COULDN’T OKAY.
THE STATE COULDN’T GET OKAY.
THE STATE COULDN’T GET TO OKAY.
THE STATE COULDN’T GET TO OKAY THE STATE COULDN’T GET TO OKAY THE STATE COULDN’T GET TO OKAY
BUT THE STATE COULDN’T GET TO OKAY
BUT WHAT THE STATE COULDN’T GET TO OKAY
BUT WHAT HAPPENED THE STATE COULDN’T GET TO OKAY
BUT WHAT HAPPENED TO THE STATE COULDN’T GET TO OKAY
BUT WHAT HAPPENED TO DENVER’S BUT WHAT HAPPENED TO DENVER’S BUT WHAT HAPPENED TO DENVER’S
AGREEMENT? AGREEMENT? AGREEMENT?
>>AGREEMENT?
>>THE AGREEMENT?
>>THE ORDINANCE AGREEMENT?
>>THE ORDINANCE IS AGREEMENT?
>>THE ORDINANCE IS VALID.>>THE ORDINANCE IS VALID.>>THE ORDINANCE IS VALID.
IS>>THE ORDINANCE IS VALID.
IS NOT>>THE ORDINANCE IS VALID.
IS NOT LIKE>>THE ORDINANCE IS VALID.
IS NOT LIKE IT>>THE ORDINANCE IS VALID.
IS NOT LIKE IT EXPIRED. IS NOT LIKE IT EXPIRED. IS NOT LIKE IT EXPIRED.
WE IS NOT LIKE IT EXPIRED.
WE GOT IS NOT LIKE IT EXPIRED.
WE GOT A IS NOT LIKE IT EXPIRED.
WE GOT A HOLD IS NOT LIKE IT EXPIRED.
WE GOT A HOLD OF IS NOT LIKE IT EXPIRED.
WE GOT A HOLD OF COUNCILMAN WE GOT A HOLD OF COUNCILMAN WE GOT A HOLD OF COUNCILMAN
FLYNN WE GOT A HOLD OF COUNCILMAN
FLYNN THAT WE GOT A HOLD OF COUNCILMAN
FLYNN THAT WAS WE GOT A HOLD OF COUNCILMAN
FLYNN THAT WAS THE WE GOT A HOLD OF COUNCILMAN
FLYNN THAT WAS THE ONE

1 thought on “The ruling that gave a jolt to the safe injection site debate”

  1. Unfortunately for you tards the ruling applies only to the geographic region of the Eastern Federal District of Pennslyvania.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *